An adequate comment from a lawyer in the style of “try to resolve the issue cheaper, but out of court.” 100500 comments from armchair lawyers: “they won’t prove it if you delete it”, “they’re just playing hard to get”, etc. The author of the topic was bragging - deleted, sent everyone to hell. A summons to court, a court, the author of the topic really must pay NNN thousand, or a little less.
And for projects that have hundreds of thousands of dollars invested, a fine of 100 poland email list thousand rubles per photo will seem like a fairy tale compared to regular content removal upon complaint. Google provides such a tool: Snitch on a competitor here File a lawsuit and throw it out of Google search results. It is precisely because of the risks associated with copyright that it is more difficult for commercial projects to do without unique content.
There is no guarantee that the owner of the site will not receive a hefty lawsuit for photos taken "from the Internet" in six months. And what if it is an online store, and the photos are copied not by the dozen, but by the thousands? The same applies to the text - above in the article I gave an example where you can simply replace the company name with your own.
A competitor's online store took your photos and climbed to the top?
-
- Posts: 464
- Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2024 5:30 am