We asked an expert in anti-fraud law

[bitheerani319]

We resolve the doubts that concern companies the most about the anti-fraud law, thanks to Luis Vilanova, CEO of leyantifraude.com.
When talking about business trends, we cannot overlook the laws that will indonesia phone number list the future of business management in the coming years. This is the case of the anti-fraud law, which establishes the new framework to prevent tax fraud and which involves the adaptation of many SMEs to a new, 100% digital framework.

To learn more about some of the details that most affect the operation of companies, we spoke with Luis Vilanova, CEO of leyantifraude.com, one of the most knowledgeable experts on this law. Thanks to him, many companies know how to react to the changes that will take place, sooner rather than later, as a consequence of this and other laws.

David Romera: Luis, why is the anti-fraud law important for companies?

Luis Vilanova: The anti-fraud law has been in force in its first four points (A, B, C, D) since October 11, 2021. That is, there have been inspections that have resulted in sanctions, seeking fraudulent use of billing or accounting software to generate parallel billing or B accounting.

The regulation per se , specified in the last two letters of the law, will come into force soon but there are already many measures that development companies must incorporate, such as backup copies or event logging.

Why now? Why apply measures now when this law is not yet fully implemented?

As I was saying, the law has been in force since October 2021 and, in addition, we already have a draft of the regulation that will be applied, and which clearly explains the security measures that companies must implement. We must be cautious because, for example, there are many companies that believe that they will not be sanctioned until the final regulation is in place, but this is not exact.

For example, having software that allows black box or parallel billing is already sanctioned, as I wrote in one of my articles . In the end, companies play with what is called “risk appetite” or, in other words, until I see my neighbor sanctioned, I take the risk and wait for the final regulation. Serious mistake.